Despite large-scale T cell activation, only a minor subset of T cells responding in vitro to Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans differentiate into effector T cells
Hh. Zadeh et al., Despite large-scale T cell activation, only a minor subset of T cells responding in vitro to Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans differentiate into effector T cells, J PERIOD RE, 35(3), 2000, pp. 127-136
Recent studies in our laboratory have demonstrated that Actinobacillus acti
nomycetemcomitans has a potent T cell stimulatory effect, activating more t
han half of all T cells, However, since the fate of these activated T cells
was not known, the present study sought to determine whether all of these
T cells differentiate into effector cells. To that end, the intracellular e
xpression of T cell cytokines (IL-2, IFN-gamma, IL-4 and IL-10) in response
to A. actinomycetemcomitans was determined by flow cytometry. Results demo
nstrated a time-dependent increase in the expression of the cytokines, most
reaching peak levels at 24-48 h. At 48 h, the proportion of T cells expres
sing each of the cytokines were as follows: IL-2 (1.7% +/- 0.3), IFN-gamma
(1.8% +/- 0.5), IL-4 (1.0% +/- 0.2) and IL-10 (1.5% +/- 0.5). These data in
dicated that only 2-5% of all T cells stimulated with A. actinomycetemcomit
ans expressed any T cell cytokines. The finding of large-scale T cell activ
ation in the absence of cytokine expression suggests that the activation of
T cells in response to A. actinomycetemcamitans is incomplete. To investig
ate this phenomenon, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were culture
d with A. actinomycetemcomitans for 24 h followed by sorting of the activat
ed (CD69(+)) cells by immunomagnetic separation and restimulation with phor
bol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) and ionomycin. Results demonstrated that
nearly 90% of the T cells were unresponsive to further restimulation. A pos
sible explanation for this unresponsiveness is the induction of clonal aner
gy among the responding T cells. To determine possible preferential effects
of the stimulation on specific cytokines, the expression of each cytokine
among T cells responding to A. actinomycetemcomitans was compared to the ma
ximum levels achieved by PMA + ionomycin stimulation. Results showed that n
umber of IL-2(+) and IFN-gamma(+) T cells observed in response to A. actino
mycetemcomitans were between 2% and 7% of those seen in response to PMA + i
onomycin. Conversely, the proportions of T cells expressing IL-4 or IL-10 w
ere between 35% and 90% of those following stimulation with PMA + ionomycin
. Hence, A. actinomycetemcamitans appears to more preferentially induce T c
ells expressing IL-4 and IL-10. Collectively, these data suggest that the i
n vitro stimulation of T cells with A. actinomycetemcomitans leads to parti
al activation, i.e. only a minor subset of T cells responding to A. actinom
ycetemcomitans differentiate into effector cells, while a significant propo
rtion become unresponsive to restimulation, suggesting clonal anergy.