Purpose: Physiologically significant renal artery lesions in the presence o
f a pheochromocytoma comprise a confounding factor which may impact on the
hypertension cure following excision of the pheochromocytoma. We present 10
cases of these dual lesions and review the literature on this entity.
Materials and Methods: From 1952 to 1999, 269 patients were diagnosed with
pheochromocytoma at our institution. Hospital charts of these patients were
reviewed retrospectively to identify those with coexisting renal artery st
enosis. A Medline search was performed to review the available literature.
Results: Of the 269 patients with pheochromocytoma 10 (3.7%) had coexisting
renal artery lesions, including renal artery stenosis in 8, renal artery a
neurysm in 1 and postangiographic dissection occlusion in 1. Pheochromocyto
ma was adrenal in 8 cases and ectopic in 2. Of the patients 9 have been tre
ated to date by adrenalectomy in 4, nephroadrenalectomy in 3, adrenalectomy
plus lysis of renal artery adhesions in 1 and adrenalectomy plus renal aut
otransplantation with bench repair in 1. Both lesions were diagnosed preope
ratively in 9 cases and a hypovascular adrenal lesion was missed preoperati
vely in i. A review of literature revealed a total of 87 cases of coexistin
g pheochromocytoma and renal artery lesions.
Conclusions: There are multiple mechanisms that can lead to renal artery st
enosis and pheochromocytoma. A high index of suspicion is necessary to enab
le both entities to be diagnosed preoperatively and allow proper planning o
f surgical therapy. Incomplete diagnosis may lead to persistent hypertensio
n postoperatively.