The segmentation of centipedes is interpreted in the light of a biphasic mo
del of segmentation (holomeric plus meromeric). The mid-body anomaly (e.g.
in the alternating short and long terga, or in the sequence of segments wit
h and without spiracles) is regarded as due to an early patterning of the e
mbryo, occurring before the onset of meromeric segmentation and affecting a
level within the fourth eosegment of the trunk. Comparisons with the Diplo
poda suggest that genital structures such as millipede gonopods did probabl
y develop originally at this spot, whose position remained marked even afte
r the transition from a putatively progoneate to the current opisthogoneate
condition of centipedes, perhaps following gene duplication and divergence
of expression patterns of the paralogues. A new lower limit for the number
of leg-bearing segments [27, in a male specimen of Schendylops oligopus (P
ereira, Minelli & Barbieri, 1995)] is established for Geophilomorpha. Coevo
lutionary trends involving the segmentation of the trunk, the segmentation
of the appendages (especially the antennae), the postembryonic developmenta
l schedule and the presence or absence of regeneration ability supports a r
ecent view of the appendages as evolutionarily divergent duplicates of the
main body axis.