Two experiments were conducted to compare young and older adults' processin
g of complex sentences involving quantifier scope ambiguities. Young adults
were hypothesized to use a mix of syntactic processing strategies to inter
pret sentences such as Every actor used a prop or An actor used every prop.
Older adults, particularly those with limited working memories, were hypot
hesized to rely on a simple pragmatic principle. Participants read the quan
tifier sentences and judged whether a continuation sentence "made sense." R
eading times for the quantifier sentences and decision times arid continuat
ion sentence acceptability judgements were analyzed. Whereas young and olde
r adults exhibited similar patterns of reading times for the quantifier sen
tences, they preferred different continuations for the Every... a quantifie
r sentences. As predicted, both young adults and older adults interpreted a
quantifier sentence such as An actor used every prop as referring to a sin
gle entity resulting in a preference for continuations such as The actor wa
s on the stage. In contrast, young and older adults made different interpre
tations of a quantifier sentence such as Every actor used a prop; young adu
lts preferred continuations postulating multiple entities such as The props
were on the stage whereas older adults, particularly those with working me
mory limitations, preferred continuations with a single entity such as The
prop was on the stage. These results support models of the effects of aging
on language processing in which immediate syntactic analysis is Hot affect
ed by aging or working memory limitations whereas postcomprehension process
es are affected by aging and/or working memory limitations.