A. Kuhn et al., Ipsilateral responses in the biceps brachii muscle after focal transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex, KLIN NEUROP, 31(2), 2000, pp. 69-75
Focal TMS of the motor cortex evokes corticospinally mediated responses in
contralateral muscles and EMG effects in ipsilateral upper limb muscles. Th
e aim of the study was to characterize ipsilateral responses m the biceps b
rachii muscle (BB) and to compare with ipsilateral EMG effects in the first
dorsal interosseus muscle (FDI). In 20 normal subjects and one patient wit
h agenesis of the corpus callosum the motor cortices of both hemispheres we
re stimulated. EMG activity was recorded bilaterally with surface electrode
s from FDI and BE. Stimulation was performed during strong tonic muscle con
traction, stimulus intensity was set to 1.5 fold of threshold at rest (n =
10, group A) or to a higher intensity of 80 % of maximum stimulator output,
i.e. about 1.8 times the response threshold (n = 10, group B). In all subj
ects corticospinally mediated contralateral excitatory responses occurred i
n FDI and BE (FDI: latency 21.7 +/- 1.5 ms, amplitude 6.5 +/- 1.7 mV; BE: l
atency 11.5 +/- 1.2 ms, amplitude 8.7 +/- 4.4 mV; n = 40). All healthy adul
ts had an ipsilateral inhibition of tonic EMG activity in the FDI (latency
37.4 +/- 2.1 ms; duration 24.6 +/- 5.7 ms; n = 40), which was not present i
n the patient. In the BE ipsilateral excitatory responses occurred in 33/40
muscles of normal subjects and in the patient. These responses had a highe
r threshold, longer onset latency and smaller amplitude compared to contral
ateral excitatory responses and were more dependent on facilitation by toni
c contraction. According to their latency, ipsilateral BE responses could b
e attributed to two different types: short latency responses (group A: late
ncy 17.8 +/- 2.1 ms, amplitude 1.3 +/- 1.2 mV; group B: latency 18.1 +/- 1.
9 ms, amplitude 1.2 +/- 0.8 mV) and long latency responses (group B: latenc
y 45.8 +/- 4.6 ms, amplitude 0.5 +/- 0.3 mV). The results show that in norm
al subjects TMS can elicit ipsilateral excitatory responses in preactivated
BB, which are probably mediated by ipsilaterally projecting oligosynaptic
and/or slowly conducting pathways.