Two indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) assays, two enzyme-linked immunosorbe
nt assays (ELISAs) and the carbon immunoassay (CLA) for determination of an
tibodies to Encephalitozoon cuniculi were compared using 210 sera of rabbit
s, 135 of which originated from seven infected colonies, while 75 originate
d from four uninfected colonies. There was no evidence of a difference betw
een the different assays with respect to the number of positive sera. There
was a clear correlation between the quantitative response measured by IIF
and CIA and the other assays, and between both IIF tests, while no such cor
relation was found in the quantitative response measured by ELISAs, which m
ight be explained by the less quantitative nature of the ELISA. Therefore q
uantitative determination of antibodies to E. cuniculi should be performed
by IIF and not by ELISA. The nosographic sensitivities N-1 and specificitie
s N-2 of the assays were greater than or equal to 0.94 and greater than or
equal to 0.97 respectively. Small differences in N-1 and N-2 between the as
says, although not statistically significant, were responsible for differen
ces in the calculated predictive values of a positive test and of a negativ
e test. As expected, the magnitude of these differences depended on the fra
ction of positive sera sampled from a given colony. There was strong eviden
ce of such a difference between the fraction of positive sera found in diff
erent colonies, hut the sample size from some colonies was too small to all
ow any conclusion, whether this was due to differences in the prevalences o
f the infection in the colonies or something else. We conclude that any of
the assays will be suitable for the routine health monitoring of laboratory
rabbit colonies for E. cuniculi infection, as recommended by the Federatio
n of European Laboratory Animal Science Associations.