Ml. Biggs et al., RELATIONSHIP OF URINARY ARSENIC TO INTAKE ESTIMATES AND A BIOMARKER OF EFFECT, BLADDER CELL MICRONUCLEI, Mutation research-reviews in mutation research, 386(3), 1997, pp. 185-195
The purpose of this study was to investigate methods for ascertaining
arsenic exposure for use in biomarker studies. Urinary arsenic concent
ration is considered a good measure of recent arsenic exposure and is
commonly used to monitor exposure in environmental and occupational se
ttings. However, measurements reflect exposure only in the last few da
ys. To cover longer time periods exposure can be estimated using arsen
ic intake data, calculated by combining measures of environmental arse
nic and inhalation/ingestion rates. We compared these different exposu
re assessment approaches in a population chronically exposed to arseni
c in drinking water in northern Chile. The study group consisted of 23
2 people, some drinking water low in arsenic (15 mu g/l) and others dr
inking water with high arsenic concentrations (up to 670 mu g/l). Firs
t morning urine samples and questionnaire data, including fluid intake
information, were collected from all participants. Exfoliated bladder
cells were collected from male participants for the bladder cell micr
onuclei assay. Eight different indices of exposure were generated, six
based on urinary arsenic (mu g As/l urine; mu g As/g creatinine; mu g
InAs/l urine; mu g MMA/l urine; mu g DMA/l urine; mu g As/h, excreted
), and two on fluid intake data (mu g As/day, ingested; mu g As/l flui
d ingested-day). The relationship between the different exposure indic
es was explored using correlation analysis. In men, exposure indices w
ere also related to a biomarker of effect, bladder cell micronuclei. W
hile creatinine-adjusted urinary arsenic concentrations had the strong
est correlations with the two intake estimates (r=0.76, r=0.81), unadj
usted urinary arsenic showed the strongest relationship with bladder c
ell micronuclei. These data suggest that, in the case of the bladder,
unadjusted urinary arsenic concentrations better reflect the effective
target organ dose compared to other exposure measures for biomarker s
tudies.