Purpose: The Kaiser Physical Activity Survey (KPAS) was evaluated for test-
retest reliability and comparison with direct and indirect measures of phys
ical activity (PA) in 50 women (ages 20-60 yr) with a broad range of physic
al activity (PA) habits. Methods: The KPAS, an adaptation of the Baecke usu
al physical activity survey, was designed specifically to assess activity i
n women. It provides four summary activity indexes: housework/caregiving, a
ctive living habits, sports, and occupation. Summary indexes were compared
against direct (Caltrac accelerometer and PA records) and indirect (cardior
espiratory fitness ((V)over dotO(2) peak) and percent body fat) criterion m
easures of PA. Participants kept detailed PA records for two, 7-d periods,
separated by 1 month. Caltrac accelerometers were worn concurrently with th
e PA records. Results: Intraclass correlations for 1-month test-retest reli
ability were high for all KPAS indexes (r = 0.79 to 0.91, P < 0.01). Age-ad
justed Spearman rho correlations between the KPAS sports/exercise and activ
e living habits indexes were of moderate magnitude for (V)over dotO(2) peak
(r = 0.34 to 0.76, P < 0.01) and percent body fat (r = -.30 to -0.59, P <
0.05). KPAS caregiving and occupation indexes were related to Caltrac kcal.
d(-1) (r = 0.30 to 0.44, P < 0.05). Correlations between similar activities
from the KPAS and PA records ranged from r = 0.03 to 0.64. Daily, habitual
activities from the KPAS and PA records had the highest correlations (r >
0.28). Correlations among infrequent activities were lower (r < 0.05). Conc
lusion: The KPAS demonstrated good reliability and was reasonably accurate
in detecting regular housework/caregiving occupation, sports/exercise, and
active leisure activities among women with a broad range of physical activi
ty habits.