A. Murrell et al., Phylogenetic analyses of the rhipicephaline ticks indicate that the genus Rhipicephalus is paraphyletic, MOL PHYL EV, 16(1), 2000, pp. 1-7
We inferred the phylogeny of 21 species and subspecies of ticks from the su
bfamilies Rhipicephalinae and Hyalomminae using cytochrome c oxidase subuni
t I (COI) and 12S rRNA mitochondrial gene sequences. Two members of the sub
family Haemaphysalinae were used for outgroup reference, The largest rhipic
ephaline genus, Rhipicephalus, was represented by ticks from six of the spe
cies groups, the second largest genus, Dermacentor, by species from two of
three of its subgenera, and the genus Boophilus by 3 of its 5 species. We a
nalyzed the 12S and COI sequences separately and together; statistically si
gnificant incongruence between the 12S rDNA and the COI sequences was not d
etected in the combined dataset using the incongruence length difference te
st. The combined dataset provided greater phylogenetic resolution than the
individual datasets, and although the 12S rDNA data had only 25% of the par
simony-informative characters, it provided half of the total partitioned Br
emer support for the combined dataset, We present the first hypothesis of p
hylogenetic relationships among some species groups of Rhipicephalus but ou
r most controversial result was that the genus Rhipicephalus is apparently
paraphyletic, unless species of Boophilus are included in it. The species o
f Rhipicephalus most closely related to Boophilus spp. were from the R. pra
vus and R. evertsi species groups, which may implicate an African origin fo
r this important group of ticks, (C) 2000 Academic Press.