Spring microzooplankton composition, biomass and potential grazing in the central Cantabrian coast (southern Bay of Biscay)

Citation
M. Quevedo et R. Anadon, Spring microzooplankton composition, biomass and potential grazing in the central Cantabrian coast (southern Bay of Biscay), OCEANOL ACT, 23(3), 2000, pp. 297-309
Citations number
46
Categorie Soggetti
Aquatic Sciences
Journal title
OCEANOLOGICA ACTA
ISSN journal
03991784 → ACNP
Volume
23
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
297 - 309
Database
ISI
SICI code
0399-1784(200005/06)23:3<297:SMCBAP>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
Microzooplankton abundance, biomass and composition were investigated in th e coastal waters of Asturias (southern Bay of Biscay) in May 1996. Abundanc e ranged from 0.7 x 10(3) to 8.5 x 10(3) cell.L-1 The protists community wa s dominated by aloricate ciliates averaging 82 % of microheterotrophs. Smal l aloricate ciliates, below 20 mu m in size, contributed 63 % to total cili ate abundance. Carbon biomass ranged from 2.4 to 15.4 mgC.m(-3), averaging 23 % of phytoplankton biomass. Aloricate ciliates were also the dominant co mponent of biomass (56.2 %), but the importance of copepod nauplii increase d in terms of carbon, averaging 28.5 % of total biomass. Microzooplankton b iomass was significantly correlated with Chi a concentration in the water c olumn. Theoretical estimates of the grazing impact of the microzooplankton community on phytoplankton were calculated and resulted in an average value of 28.3% of phytoplankton standing stock potentially consumed per day. Cho reotrich ciliates were the most important potential grazers in the study (1 3.7% of standing stock) followed by metazoan nauplii (6.3 %). The potential microzooplankton impact on phytoplankton was consistent with the large siz e of primary producers during diatom spring blooms, like the one found in t his study. The validity of theoretical estimates of microzooplankton grazin g impact, as well as the importance of including metazoan larvae in coastal microzooplankton community studies are discussed. (C) 2000 Ifremer/CNRS/IR D/Editions scientifiques et medicales Elsevier SAS.