In this paper we examine the likely consequences for the sustainability of
fiscal policy of pursuing goals that rely on restictive ceilings on deficit
s and debt. We provide a formal theoretical framework for analyzing the sus
tainability of fiscal policy based on the government intertemporal budget c
onstraint and derive conditions that determine whether a given fiscal stanc
e is sustainable. This framework generalizes the existing literature in sev
eral important respects. We allow for time-varying interest rates, for feed
back from debt to the primary deficit, for a finite planning horizon suitab
le for medium-term policy making, for possible future policy shifts, we sho
w how published forecasts can be used and we provide a measure of fiscal pr
essure. We then apply this analysis to the fiscal positions of the United S
tates and the European Union countries since 1970 and to their planned posi
tions over the next decade.
We find that many countries do not have a sustainable policy. The evidence
in favour of sustainablitly is strengthened for most countries when the dat
a are extended to incorporate future fiscal consolidation plans, reflecting
the general shift toward fiscal austerity in recent years. In contrast, wi
th a finite horizon we show that the recent policy shift made the paths of
future policies sustainable. However, imposing ceilings on debt or deficit-
to-GDP ratios throws most economies onto an intertemporally inconsistent pa
th unless governments undertake a major tax or expenditure adjustment. High
-debt countries can satisfy debt rules only by raising (reducing) the avera
ge tax (spending) rate substantially for five years. A deficit ceiling puts
an increasingly high pressure on most economies, including the United Stat
es, requiring a gradual rise (decline) in the tax (spending) rate. We concl
ude therefore that imposing debt or deficit ceilings could lead to fiscal p
olicy becoming a difficult political choice.