Sf. Sears et al., Assessing the psychosocial impact of the ICD: A national survey of implantable cardioverter defibrillator health care providers, PACE, 23(6), 2000, pp. 939-945
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) provides a survival advant
age over antiarrhythmic medications for patients with life-threatening vent
ricular arrhythmias. However, the effect of ICD therapy on quality-of-life
and psychosocial functioning are not as well understood. Health care provid
ers (e.g., physicians, nurses) can serve as a valuable source of informatio
n related to these ICD outcomes. The purpose of this study was to investiga
te health care provider perceptions regarding: (1) the quality-of-life and
psychosocial functioning of their ICD recipients, (2) the concerns or probl
ems reported by ICD recipients, and (3) the degree of provider comfort in m
anaging these concerns. The final sample of health care providers (n = 261)
rated ICD recipients' global quality-of-life and psychosocial functioning,
and specific concerns about health care, lifestyle, special population adj
ustment, marital and family adjustment, and emotional well-being. With rega
rd to quality-of-life, health care providers reported that the majority of
ICD recipients were functioning bet ter (38%) or about the same (47%) than
before implantation. However, health care providers reported that 15% of re
cipients experienced worse quality-of-life postimplantation. Similarly heal
th care providers indicated that 10%-20% of ICD recipients experienced wors
e emotional functioning and strained family relationships. Moreover, issues
related to driving, dealing with ICD shocks, and depression were the most
common ICD recipient concerns. Significant differences were noted between p
hysicians and nurses/other health care professionals on a wide range of psy
chosocial issues. Health care providers generally reported the most comfort
dealing with traditional medical issues (i.e., patient adherence), and the
least comfort in managing emotional well-being issues (e.g., depression an
d anxiety). These results suggest that routine attention to ICD quality-of-
life and psychosocial outcomes is indicated for health care providers who c
are for ICD recipients.