The purpose of this study was to evaluate a pacing system using the recogni
tion of cardiac evoked response for the automatic adjustment of pacing outp
ut. Patients were prospectively followed after primary implantation of VVIR
pacemakers using AutoCapture (St. Jude Medical CRMD). Sensing and pacing t
hresholds, polarization signal, evoked response, and AutoCapture performanc
e were evaluated with serial visits and 24-hour Holter monitoring. Three hu
ndred ninety-eight patients (mean age 71 +/- 15 years) were followed for an
average duration of 1 year (3 days-1.75 years) with the algorithm function
al in > 90% of patients. Backup pacing in the event of exit block was confi
rmed in all patients. Pacing thresholds remained stable at 0.89 +/- 0.34 V
with a pulse width of 0.31 ms (with chronic output autoset at 0.3 V above t
he actual threshold). Evoked response exhibited a small but statistically s
ignificant increase with time (8.92 V at implant, 9.60 mV at 12 months), ho
wever, this finding did not result in any change in AutoCapture function du
ring our follow-up period. The polarization signal remained stable with min
imal variation (1.12 mV at implant, 1.18 at 12 months). No clinical adverse
events were observed using the AutoCapture algorithm. In this initial expe
rience with the AutoCapture algorithm the evoked response and polarization
measurements remained adequate, allowing the system to function in the majo
rity of patients with safe, low output pacing. High energy backup pacing pr
ovided an added safety feature over fixed output devices in cases of unexpe
cted threshold rises. Longer follow-up is required for continued long-term
validation of the algorithm.