C. Homer et al., An evaluation of an innovative multimedia educational software program forasthma management: Report of a randomized, controlled trial, PEDIATRICS, 106(1), 2000, pp. 210-215
Background. Asthma continues to be a substantial cause of morbidity in pedi
atric populations. New strategies are needed to provide cost-effective educ
ational interventions for children with asthma, particularly those in the i
nner city.
Objective. To assess the effectiveness of a multimedia educational software
program about asthma.
Setting. A hospital-based primary care clinic and an affiliated neighborhoo
d health center.
Design. Randomized, controlled trial.
Population. Children 3 to 12 years old with physician-diagnosed asthma.
Intervention. An interactive educational computer program, Asthma Control,
designed to teach children about asthma and its management. Using a graphic
display of a child going through simulated daily events, the game emphasiz
es: 1) monitoring; 2) allergen identification; 3) use of medications; 4) us
e of health services; and 5) maintenance of normal activity. Control group
participants reviewed printed educational materials with a research assista
nt.
Outcomes. Acute health care use (emergency department and outpatient) was t
he primary outcome. Secondary outcome measures included maternal report of
asthma symptom severity, child functional status and school absences, satis
faction with care, and parental and child knowledge of asthma.
Results. A total of 137 families were enrolled in the study (76 interventio
n, 61 control). Both intervention and control groups showed substantial imp
rovement in all outcomes during the 12-month follow-up period. Aside from i
mprovement in knowledge after use of the computer program, no differences w
ere demonstrated between the 2 groups in primary or secondary outcome measu
res. Children reported enjoyment of program use.
Conclusions. This trial of an educational software program found that it di
d not produce greater improvement than occurred with review of traditional
written materials. Because both groups showed substantial improvement over
baseline, computer-based education may be more cost-effective. Alternativel
y, improvements in illness severity over time may overshadow the effects of
such interventions.
Rigorous comprehensive evaluations such as this are necessary to assess new
interventions intended to improve management and outcomes of asthma.