Validity and utility of computer-based test interpretation

Computers have been important to applied psychology since their introductio n, and the application of computerized methods has expanded in recent decad es. The application of computerized methods has broadened in both scope and depth. This article explores the most recent uses of computer-based assess ment methods and examines their validity. The comparability between compute r-administered tests and their pencil-and-paper counterparts is discussed. Basic decision making in psychiatric screening, personality assessment, neu ropsychology, and personnel psychology is also investigated. Studies on the accuracy of computerized narrative reports in personality assessment and p sychiatric screening are then summarized. Research thus far appears to indi cate that computer-generated reports should be viewed as valuable adjuncts to, rather than substitutes for, clinical judgment. Additional studies are needed to support broadened computer-based test usage.