Ca. Smith et al., BINDING OF RUTHENIUM(III) ANTITUMOR DRUGS TO HUMAN LACTOFERRIN PROBEDBY HIGH-RESOLUTION X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC STRUCTURE ANALYSES, JBIC. Journal of biological inorganic chemistry, 1(5), 1996, pp. 424-431
The binding to human lactoferrin of three Ru(III) complexes with anti-
tumor activity has been investigated by X-ray crystallography in order
to gain insights into how such complexes might be carried during tran
sferrin-mediated delivery to cells. The complexes, HIm[RuIm(2)Cl(4)],
HInd[RuInd(2)Cl(4)] and (HInd)(2) [RuIndCl(5)], where Im = imidazole a
nd Ind = indazole, were diffused into crystals of apo-lactoferrin (apo
Lf). X-ray diffraction data were collected to 2.6 Angstrom, 2.2 Angstr
om and 2.4 Angstrom respectively. The binding sites for the Ru complex
es were determined from difference Fouriers, in comparison with native
apoLf; the two indazole-apoLf complexes were also refined crystallogr
aphically to final R factors of 0.202 (for 8.0 to 2.3 Angstrom data) a
nd 0.192 (for 8.0 to 2.4 Angstrom data) respectively. Two types of bin
ding site were identified, a high-affinity site at His 253 in the open
N-lobe iron-binding cleft of apoLf (and by analogy a similar one at H
is 597 in the C-lobe), and lower-affinity sites at surface-exposed His
residues, primarily His 590 and His 654. The exogenous heterocyclic l
igands remain bound to Ru, at least at the His 253 site, and modelling
suggests that the nature and number of these ligands may determine wh
ether the closed structure that is required for receptor binding could
be formed or not. The results also highlight the importance of His re
sidues for binding such complexes and the value of heavy atom binding
studies from crystallographic analyses for identifying non-specific bi
nding sites on proteins.