Background: We performed a consecutive series of unilateral laparoscopic ad
renalectomies (LA) with the expectation of short (less than 24 h) hospital
stay. Results were compared with those from laparoscopic cholecystectomy (L
C) and unilateral open adrenalectomy (OA).
Methods: A combination of chart review and patient questionnaires was used
to compare LA (n = 19) to LC (n = 20) regarding length of stay (LOS), narco
tic requirements, and time to full recovery. Chart reviews also were used t
o compare LA to OA(n = 48) regarding operating room time (OR time), LOS, an
d surgical morbidity.
Results: All of the LC patients as compared with 47% of the LA patients wer
e discharged within 24 h. The reason for additional hospitalization in the
LA group was pain control. After discharge, the narcotic requirement lasted
6.6 days in the LA group as compared with 3.4 days in the LC group (p < 0.
01), but the times until full recovery were not significantly different (12
.2 vs 11.3 days respectively). Operating room times did not differ signific
antly between the LA and OA groups (3.3 and 3.8 h, respectively), but there
were fewer postoperative complications and much shorter LOS in the LA grou
p (1.5 vs 6.3 days; p < 0.001), a difference that remained significant even
when cases from the same time period were compared.
Conclusions: Increased pain in LA as compared with LC patients may result i
n a slightly longer LOS and higher narcotic requirement during the early po
stoperative period, but time to full recovery between the two groups is the
same. As compared with its open counterpart, LA offers a significant reduc
tion in LOS and morbidity with no increase in OR time.