The balanced scorecard is a new tool that complements traditional measures
of business unit performance. The scorecard contains a diverse set of perfo
rmance measures, including financial performance, customer relations, inter
nal business processes, and learning and growth. Advocates of the balanced
scorecard suggest that each unit in the organization should develop and use
its own scorecard, choosing measures that capture the unit's business stra
tegy. Our study examines judgmental effects of the balanced scorecard-speci
fically, how balanced scorecards that include some measures common to multi
ple units and other measures that are unique to a particular unit affect su
periors' evaluations of that unit's performance. Our test shows that only t
he common measures affect the superiors' evaluations. We discuss the implic
ations of this result for research and practice.