The potential role of the esophageal pre-epithelial barrier components in the maintenance of integrity of the esophageal mucosa in patients with endoscopically negative gastroesophageal reflux disease

Citation
M. Marcinkiewicz et al., The potential role of the esophageal pre-epithelial barrier components in the maintenance of integrity of the esophageal mucosa in patients with endoscopically negative gastroesophageal reflux disease, AM J GASTRO, 95(7), 2000, pp. 1652-1660
Citations number
53
Categorie Soggetti
Gastroenerology and Hepatology
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
ISSN journal
00029270 → ACNP
Volume
95
Issue
7
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1652 - 1660
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-9270(200007)95:7<1652:TPROTE>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) accompanied by erosive reflux esophagitis (RE) exhibit an impairment within the esopha geal pre-epithelial barrier protective components that may facilitate the d evelopment and/or progression of the mucosal injury. Little is known, howev er, whether such impairment is a general phenomenon affecting all patients with GERD or whether this is a characteristic feature only of patients with erosive RE. We therefore studied the rate of secretion of esophageal inorg anic and organic protective factors in patients with endoscopically negativ e [E (-)] GERD and compared these results with the corresponding values in asymptomatic volunteers (CTRL). METHODS: The study was conducted on 33 white asymptomatic volunteers and 10 white patients with a long history of GERD confirmed by 24-h pH monitoring and a grossly negative upper endoscopy. Esophageal secretion was collected during mucosal exposure to NaCl, HCl, HC/pepsin and NaCl using the esophag eal perfusion catheter. In collected samples all investigated parameters we re measured. RESULTS: The pH of esophageal secretion and its content of bicarbonate, EGF , and PGE(2) in patients with E (-) GERD and asymptomatic volunteers were s imilar. Unexpectedly, the rate of esophageal glycoconjugate (predominantly mucin) secretion was significantly higher in patients with E (-) GERD than in controls during perfusion with HCl (p < 0.05). Furthermore, secretion of protein in patients with E (-) GERD was significantly higher than in the c ontrol group during the mucosal exposure to HCl/Pepsin (p < 0.05). The nonb icarbonate buffer secretion during perfusion with HCl and HCl/Pepsin as wel l as the rate of esophageal TGF alpha output during infusion of final salin e in patients with E (-) GERD were significantly lower than in CTRL group ( p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that patients with E (-) GERD have an esopha geal secretory potential, in terms of glycoconjugate and protein, higher th an that in asymptomatic controls. This phenomenon in patients with E (-) GE RD may, by enhancing the quantity of the esophageal pre-epithelial barrier, help to prevent the development of erosive esophagitis. A significantly lo wer esophageal secretory response in patients with E (-) GERD in terms of n onbicarbonate buffers and TGF alpha may facilitate the development of GERD symptoms and histological changes of GERD, respectively. (C) 2000 by Am. Ce ll. of Gastroenterology.