The potential role of the esophageal pre-epithelial barrier components in the maintenance of integrity of the esophageal mucosa in patients with endoscopically negative gastroesophageal reflux disease
M. Marcinkiewicz et al., The potential role of the esophageal pre-epithelial barrier components in the maintenance of integrity of the esophageal mucosa in patients with endoscopically negative gastroesophageal reflux disease, AM J GASTRO, 95(7), 2000, pp. 1652-1660
OBJECTIVE: Patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) accompanied
by erosive reflux esophagitis (RE) exhibit an impairment within the esopha
geal pre-epithelial barrier protective components that may facilitate the d
evelopment and/or progression of the mucosal injury. Little is known, howev
er, whether such impairment is a general phenomenon affecting all patients
with GERD or whether this is a characteristic feature only of patients with
erosive RE. We therefore studied the rate of secretion of esophageal inorg
anic and organic protective factors in patients with endoscopically negativ
e [E (-)] GERD and compared these results with the corresponding values in
asymptomatic volunteers (CTRL).
METHODS: The study was conducted on 33 white asymptomatic volunteers and 10
white patients with a long history of GERD confirmed by 24-h pH monitoring
and a grossly negative upper endoscopy. Esophageal secretion was collected
during mucosal exposure to NaCl, HCl, HC/pepsin and NaCl using the esophag
eal perfusion catheter. In collected samples all investigated parameters we
re measured.
RESULTS: The pH of esophageal secretion and its content of bicarbonate, EGF
, and PGE(2) in patients with E (-) GERD and asymptomatic volunteers were s
imilar. Unexpectedly, the rate of esophageal glycoconjugate (predominantly
mucin) secretion was significantly higher in patients with E (-) GERD than
in controls during perfusion with HCl (p < 0.05). Furthermore, secretion of
protein in patients with E (-) GERD was significantly higher than in the c
ontrol group during the mucosal exposure to HCl/Pepsin (p < 0.05). The nonb
icarbonate buffer secretion during perfusion with HCl and HCl/Pepsin as wel
l as the rate of esophageal TGF alpha output during infusion of final salin
e in patients with E (-) GERD were significantly lower than in CTRL group (
p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that patients with E (-) GERD have an esopha
geal secretory potential, in terms of glycoconjugate and protein, higher th
an that in asymptomatic controls. This phenomenon in patients with E (-) GE
RD may, by enhancing the quantity of the esophageal pre-epithelial barrier,
help to prevent the development of erosive esophagitis. A significantly lo
wer esophageal secretory response in patients with E (-) GERD in terms of n
onbicarbonate buffers and TGF alpha may facilitate the development of GERD
symptoms and histological changes of GERD, respectively. (C) 2000 by Am. Ce
ll. of Gastroenterology.