OBJECTIVE: Hepatic iron overload is observed in many forms of chronic liver
disease. Hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) results in hepatic iron overload
and is associated with 2 missense mutations in the HFE gene. The aim of thi
s study was to define the usefulness of the histological pattern of iron de
position in determining the probability of an iron-loaded patient having HF
E-related iron overload.
METHODS: This study assessed liver biopsies containing stainable iron from
103 patients with various liver diseases; clinical information included hep
atic iron concentration and HFE genotype (C282Y, H63D). The biopsies were e
valuated using a reproducible histological scoring system for iron depositi
on. Three separate components of histological iron deposition were recorded
: 1) pattern (primarily hepatocellular with a zonal gradient, or reticuloen
dothelial without an obvious zonal gradient), 2) pattern score to denote th
e extent of iron within the acinus, and 3) quantitation grade of iron granu
les within affected hepatocytes.
RESULTS: The predominantly hepatocellular pattern (HH pattern) was observed
in 72 biopsies of which only 42 were from patients homozygous for the C282
Y mutation, indicating that this pattern alone cannot be used as a surrogat
e marker for HH genotype. The predominantly reticuloendothelial pattern (no
n-HH pattern) was observed in the remaining 31 patients, none of whom was c
ompound heterozygous or homozygous for the C282Y mutation (negative predict
ive value: 100%). Thus, the non-HH, reticuloendothelial pattern reliably pr
edicts the absence of homozygosity for the C282Y mutation.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of histological evaluation for iron deposition is simp
le, assists in expanding information communicated from histopathologic obse
rvations, and may be clinically useful in determining the necessity of furt
her evaluation of HFE genotype in subjects with histological evidence of he
patic iron overload. (C) 2000 by Am. Coll. of Gastroenterology).