Bayesian photometric redshift estimation

Authors
Citation
N. Benitez, Bayesian photometric redshift estimation, ASTROPHYS J, 536(2), 2000, pp. 571-583
Citations number
39
Categorie Soggetti
Space Sciences
Journal title
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
ISSN journal
0004637X → ACNP
Volume
536
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Part
1
Pages
571 - 583
Database
ISI
SICI code
0004-637X(20000620)536:2<571:BPRE>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
Photometric redshifts are quickly becoming an essential tool of observation al cosmology, although their utilization is somewhat hindered by certain sh ortcomings of the existing methods, e.g., the unreliability of maximum-like lihood techniques or the limited application range of the "training-set" ap proach. The application of Bayesian inference to the problem of photometric redshift estimation effectively overcomes most of these problems. The use of prior probabilities and Bayesian marginalization facilitates the inclusi on of relevant knowledge, such as the expected shape of the redshift distri butions and the galaxy type fractions, which can be readily obtained from e xisting surveys but are often ignored by other methods. If this previous in formation is lacking or insufficient-for instance, because of the unprecede nted depth of the observations-the corresponding prior distributions can be calibrated using even the data sample for which the photometric redshifts are being obtained. An important advantage of Bayesian statistics is that t he accuracy of the redshift estimation can be characterized in a way that h as no equivalents in other statistical approaches, enabling the selection o f galaxy samples with extremely reliable photometric redshifts. In this way , it is possible to determine the properties of individual galaxies more ac curately, and simultaneously estimate the statistical properties of a sampl e in an optimal fashion. Moreover, the Bayesian formalism described here ca n be easily generalized to deal with a wide range of problems that make use of photometric redshifts. There is excellent agreement between the approxi mate to 130 Hubble Deep Field North (HDF-N) spectroscopic redshifts and the predictions of the method, with a rms error of Delta z approximate to 0.06 (1 + z(spec)) up to z < 6 and no outliers nor systematic biases. It should be remarked that since these results have not been reached following a trai ning-set procedure, the above value of Delta z should be a fair estimate of the expected accuracy for any similar sample. The method is further tested by estimating redshifts in the HDF-N but restricting the color information to the UBVI filters; the results are shown to be significantly more reliab le than those obtained with maximum-likelihood techniques.