I. Scott et al., The use of evidence-based medicine in the practice of consultant physicians - Results of a questionnaire survey, AUST NZ J M, 30(3), 2000, pp. 319-326
Citations number
40
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Background: Information is lacking about the extent to which Australasian p
hysicians apply methods of evidence-based medicine (EBM) in routine practic
e. Aims: To assess the frequency and predictors of use of EBM methods in a
sample of consultant physicians in adult medicine.
Methods: Self-administered questionnaires were distributed to a convenience
sample of 545 physicians from October 1998 to January 1999.
Results: One hundred and eleven questionnaires were returned (20% response
rate). Ninety-eight (88%) respondents formulated five or less clinical ques
tions per week; 69 (62%) undertook five or more evidence searches per week,
the majority as MEDLINE searches involving therapeutic topics. Respondents
identified insufficient time (74%), limited search skills (41%), and limit
ed access to evidence (43%) as search impediments. In determining evidence
quality, 37% frequently relied on global impressions, while 22% frequently
applied explicit critical appraisal (p = 0.008). Efficiency of literature s
earches was rated on average as good/very good by 18%, fair by 52% and poor
by 30%. As a result of EBM, 47% frequently had confidence in pre-existing
decisions increased, 39% gained improved knowledge, and 5% altered clinical
decisions. Frequently encountered inhibitors to changing practice were per
sonal conservatism (40%), organisational constraints (40%), and interdiscip
linary tensions (39%). Perceived weaknesses of EBM included: limited applic
ability to individual patients (26%); evidence deficiencies (25%); and too
time consuming (13%). In making EBM more attractive, one third requested re
liable evidence sources at the point of care.
Conclusions: The application of EBM to routine practice by physicians is co
nstrained by deficient EBM skills, limited access to evidence, lack of time
, and cognitive and environmental factors. Targeted education in EBM and sy
stems that quickly deliver high-quality evidence at the point of care are n
eeded in realising the full potential of EBM to improve care.