Objectives To prospectively evaluate scrotal ultrasonography (SUS) in patie
nts presenting with scrotal symptoms and to make recommendations about use
of SUS in clinical practice.
Patients and methods Forty-eight men with scrotal symptoms were examined by
a urologist and independently underwent SUS by one radiologist with no kno
wledge of the clinical diagnosis. The clinical and SUS diagnoses were compa
red and the effect on subsequent management recorded.
Results The clinical and SUS diagnoses agreed in 35 men (73%) although SUS
provided an additional diagnosis in half of these men. The SUS diagnosis di
ffered in 13 men (27%) although the management was altered in only four pat
ients.
Conclusion The clinical diagnosis is correct in most men with scrotal sympt
oms; the routine use of SUS is inappropriate and should be reserved for spe
cific indications.