Cost of apical dominance in two monocarpic herbs, Erysimum strictum and Rhinanthus minor

Citation
Ap. Huhta et al., Cost of apical dominance in two monocarpic herbs, Erysimum strictum and Rhinanthus minor, CAN J BOTAN, 78(5), 2000, pp. 591-599
Citations number
51
Categorie Soggetti
Plant Sciences
Journal title
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE BOTANIQUE
ISSN journal
00084026 → ACNP
Volume
78
Issue
5
Year of publication
2000
Pages
591 - 599
Database
ISI
SICI code
0008-4026(200005)78:5<591:COADIT>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
Apical dominance is advantageous in conditions favoring rapid growth in hei ght and unbranched architecture. The cost of apical dominance, on the other hand, should be expressed in conditions where fecundity increases along wi th an increasing number of branches. Apical damage can be used to measure s uch costs: when suppressed meristems are released from apical inhibition, t he vegetative and reproductive productivity of initially unbranched plants should increase owing to the regrowth and increased branch development foll owing damage. We studied these regrowth responses in two monocarpic herbs, Erysimum strictum P. Gaertn., B. Mey., and Scherb. and Rhinanthus minor L., after both apical damage (10% of the shoot cut) and more extensive damage (50 and 75% cutting). Both species tolerated apical damage, although severe damage had detrimental effects on the performance of both, especially R. m inor Apical damage had positive effects on most of the measured performance parameters of Erysimum. However, the success of seed germination collapsed , presumably due to delayed flowering and less successful pollination. The response was parallel in Rhinanthus; apical damage affected neither the veg etative biomass nor fecundity, but heavier damage, especially 75% clipping, led to severe reductions in most performance measures. The differences in regrowth responses are presumably due to the different habitat requirements of the species. Rhinanthus prefers relatively dense vegetation and starts to branch and produce flowers after a certain threshold in height has been reached, whereas Erysimum prefers gaps in vegetation. In this species, unbr anched architecture may be favored in closed vegetation and branched archit ecture in less competitive habitats. In both species, fruit production corr elated positively with the number of branches in both control and clipped p lants, which is consistent with the assumption of the cost of apical domina nce.