O. Chavanon et al., Endoscopic saphenectomy for coronary artery bypass surgery: Comparison of two techniques with and without carbon dioxide insufflation, CAN J CARD, 16(6), 2000, pp. 757-761
OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical results of an initial experience with tw
o techniques of endoscopic saphenectomy with and without gas insufflation.
DESIGN: A retrospective study was performed between September 1998 and Marc
h 1999 on 40 patients who underwent endoscopic saphenectomy for coronary ar
tery bypass graft without (group 1, n=15) and with (group 2, n=25) carbon d
ioxide insufflation.
INTERVENTIONS: In both groups, the site of harvesting was at the knee throu
gh a 2 cm incision. In group 1, dissection was performed using a hand-held
dissector while in group 2 dissection was performed after ensuring that the
re was a seal at the knee and insufflation of carbon dioxide. Collaterals w
ere controlled with an endoclipper in group 1 and bipolar scissors in group
2. Intraoperative procedure time, length of the harvested vein and aspect
of the thigh (ecchymosis, hematoma, infection) were recorded.
RESULTS: Vein trauma occurred in four patients in group 1 (four of 15, 27%)
and in one in group 2 (one of 25, 4%). Hematomas developed in four patient
s in group 1 (four of 15, 27%) and in one patient in group 2 (one of 25, 4%
). Wound infection occurred in no patients in group 1 and in one patient in
group 2. One patient in group 2 suffered carbon dioxide embolism with no u
ntoward consequences. Conversion to an open technique was necessary in five
patients in group 1 (five of 15, 33%) and in two patients in group 2 (two
of 25, 8%).
CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic saphenectomy both with and without carbon dioxide i
nsufflation is associated with a low infection rate, but vein trauma and wo
und hematomas are more common without carbon dioxide insufflation.