BACKGROUND: In the normal heart, pericardial pressure is greater than previ
ously believed.
OBJECTIVES: To explore the contribution of pericardial constraint to the el
evated left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic pressure in chronic heart failur
e (CHF).
ANIMALS AND METHODS: Pericardial pressure was measured directly in 11 dogs
with CHF. Seven dogs were instrumented with LV and right ventricular microm
anometers and epicardial pacing leads, and paced at 240 to 260 beats/min fo
r four to seven weeks. After the development of CHF, a left thoracotomy was
performed and a flat pericardial balloon was positioned over the LV free w
all through a slit in the pericardium.
RESULTS: LV end-diastolic pressure was 31+/-9 mmHg, and pericardial pressur
e only 7+/-2 mmHg. Nitroglycerin in six dogs decreased LV end-diastolic pre
ssure from 33+/-8 to 28+/-7 and peri cardial pressure from 7+/-2 to 6+/-3 m
mHg (both P<0.05). Calculated transmural LV end-diastolic pressure also dec
reased (26+/-8 to 22+/-7 mmHg, P<0.05). Volume loading in five dogs increas
ed LV end-diastolic pressure from 29+/-8 to 42+/-10 mmHg (P<0.05), pericard
ial pressure from 6+3 to 12+/-6 mmHg (not significant) and transmural LV en
d-diastolic pressure from 23+/-7 to 30+/-7 mmHg (not significant). When the
pericardium was opened in three dogs, the LV end-diastolic pressure decrea
sed by 5 mmHg. Four previously uninstrumented dogs were studied to exclude
the effects of epicardial scarring; LV end-diastolic pressure was 42+/-6 mm
Hg and pericardial pressure was 10+/-6 mmHg.
CONCLUSION: Pericardial constraint, a prerequisite for pericardially mediat
ed ventricular interaction, was not present to the same extent in this mode
l of CHF as in acute models, probably reflecting the importance of pericard
ial remodelling.