Rectal mucosal proliferation and risk of colorectal adenomas: Results froma randomized controlled trial

Citation
Rs. Sandler et al., Rectal mucosal proliferation and risk of colorectal adenomas: Results froma randomized controlled trial, CANC EPID B, 9(7), 2000, pp. 653-656
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION
ISSN journal
10559965 → ACNP
Volume
9
Issue
7
Year of publication
2000
Pages
653 - 656
Database
ISI
SICI code
1055-9965(200007)9:7<653:RMPARO>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
Although rectal mucosal labeling index is thought to be a useful surrogate biomarker for colorectal cancer, the ability of the index to predict future neoplasia is unclear, We obtained rectal mucosal biopsies from 333 partici pants of a randomized controlled chemoprevention trial of calcium supplemen tation to determine whether labeling index was correlated with concurrent o r future colorectal neoplasms. Labeling index was measured using proliferat ing cell nuclear antigen immunohistochemistry. Adenomas were enumerated at the time of the biopsies (cross-sectional) and 3 years later (prospective), We used logistic regression to test for an association of adenoma occurren ce with overall labeling index, the mean proliferative height, and labeling index in the upper 40% of colon crypts, In the cross-sectional analysis, w e found indications that higher proliferation was associated with an increa se in the prevalence of adenomas, The overall adjusted odds ratios (OR) (95 % confidence interval) were 1.14 (0.90-1.45) per % crypt labeling index, OR 1.08 (0.99-1.19) for upper crypt proliferation, and OR 1.07 (1.03-1.12) fo r proliferative height. In contrast, individuals with higher labeling index at baseline were actually less likely to have adenomas in the prospective analyses: OR 0.80 (0.62-1.02) per % crypt labeling index, OR 0.86 (0.73-1.0 0) for upper crypt index, and OR 0.97 (0.93-1.01) for proliferative height, Proliferative index does not predict future colorectal neoplasia, although it may be weakly associated with the presence of current adenomas, These r esults: have important implications for the design of future intervention s tudies, Although it may be attractive to include the measurement of interme diate markers in large controlled trials, until we have more confidence in their performance, we should rely on better proven and more reliable interm ediates, such as adenomas.