Study objective: To describe variability in the conduct of walk tests in pu
lmonary rehabilitation programs.
Design: Analysis of information obtained by means of a structured written q
uestionnaire.
Setting: Outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation programs in the United States
and Canada.
Participants: Clinical coordinators of 75 pulmonary rehabilitation programs
.
Interventions: None
Results: Timed walk tests were obtained in 71 of 99 programs sun eyed. Cons
iderable variability in all aspects of testing practices was evident. Fifty
-seven respondents (80%) based results on a single walk. Walk tests were co
mpleted in a hallway (73%), on a walking track (9%), and on a treadmill (7%
), In 29 programs (44%), a walk supervisor carried or pulled the oxygen sou
rce, while in 25 programs (38%), the oxygen was carried or pulled by the pa
tient. Informal nonstandardized instructions were provided to patients prio
r to walking in 41 programs (58%), In 53 programs (76%), the walk superviso
r could direct a patient to speed up, to slow down, or to rest. Evaluations
of breathlessness and perceived exertion were measured during the walk by
73% and 16% of programs, respectively.
Conclusions: Practices regarding performance of timed walk tests are poorly
standardized among pulmonary rehabilitation programs. Further research is
needed to evaluate the impact of certain variations in testing practices on
test results.