Nh. Pham et al., Anaphylaxis to chlorhexidine. Case report. Implication of immunoglobulin Eantibodies and identification of an allergenic determinant, CLIN EXP AL, 30(7), 2000, pp. 1001-1007
Background There are many reports of allergic reactions, including anaphyla
xis, following exposure to chlorhexidine. Reactions may occur via contact w
ith the skin and mucous membranes or from catheters treated with the antiba
cterial agent. Apart from implicating chlorguanide in immunoglobulin (Ig)E
antibody-binding studies on serum from an anaphylactic patient, little work
has been done on the molecular basis of recognition of the agent in sensit
ive subjects.
Objectives The molecular basis of IgE-binding to chlorhexidine was closely
examined with the view of defining its fine structural recognition features
by antibodies from a subject who experienced anaphylaxis following contact
with the antiseptic.
Methods Tryptase determinations, different drug-solid phases, immunoassays
and quantitative hapten inhibition studies with chlorhexidine and selected
structural analogues were employed together with serum from the anaphylacti
c patient. Results were analysed to define the complete drug allergenic det
erminant and to identify the important structural features complementary to
the IgE antibody combining sites.
Results The subject's serum tryptase levels sampled after the reaction were
elevated and employment of a chlorhexidine-EA Sepharose solid phase showed
the presence of serum IgE antibodies to the drug. Lack of inhibition by 4-
chlorophenol and other selected substituted phenyl compounds showed that th
e terminal groups at each end of the chlorhexidine molecule, alone, did not
account for antibody recognition of the antibacterial agent. Although chlo
rguanide and alexidine, the structures of which each comprise part of the c
hlorhexidine molecule, showed significant inhibition of the binding of IgE
antibodies to chlorhexidine, neither compound was as potent an inhibitor as
chlorhexidine itself. Two molecules of chlorguanide make up the symmetrica
l molecule of chlorhexidine while the interior structure of alexidine (that
is excluding the terminal 2-ethylhexyl groups) is identical to part of the
chlorhexidine molecule.
Conclusions Taken together, for this patient, these results lead to the con
clusion that the whole chlorhexidine molecule is complementary to the IgE a
ntibody combining sites and that the 4-chlorophenol, biguanide and hexameth
ylene structures together comprise the allergenic determinant. Hence, like
one of the trimethoprim determinants identified, but unlike most drug aller
genic determinants identified so far, the chlorhexidine allergenic determin
ant identified here encompasses the entire molecule.