Conflicting evidence regarding the abihty of the Supreme Court to conf
er policy legimacy suggests that the process of legitimation is both s
ubtle and multifaceted. Two aspects of this process are examined here.
First, the relationship between policy legitimacy and policy agreemen
t is explored. Experimental tests demonstrate that policy legitimacy e
merges from a direct process of symbolic legitimation, and through an
indirect process of persuasive legitimation. Second, the mediated char
acter of Supreme Court ruling is examined as it relates to the Court's
ability to enhance policy legitimacy. Experimental tests reveal diat
the Coures power of legitimation remains consistent regardless of vari
ance in the specific content of news coverage. Collectively, findigs h
ighlight the intricacy of policy legitimation while providing evidence
that die institutional legitimacy maintained by the Supreme Court can
produce significant shifts in policy evaluations.