A. Dalaka et al., Modelling the effects of environmental conditions on apparent photosynthesis of Stipa bromoides by machine learning tools, ECOL MODEL, 129(2-3), 2000, pp. 245-257
Apparent leaf photosynthesis of the grass Stipa bromoides was measured in t
he field in two sites of Northern Greece. For predicting apparent photosynt
hesis from irradiance, temperature and relative air humidity data, we appli
ed and compared two modelling approaches: ordinary statistical modelling an
d automatic model construction based on machine learning procedures. Ordina
ry statistical models were constructed based on background knowledge concer
ning the response of photosynthesis to irradiance. A Michaelis-Menten type
light saturation curve was selected among six candidate models and was exte
nded to include air temperature effects. A bell-shaped function of temperat
ure was substituted for the parameter describing the asymptotic maximum pho
tosynthesis. The final model accounted for 67.3% of data variation and was
further improved by splitting the data set by experimental site. Site-speci
fic differences were detected regarding the half saturation constant for li
ght and the optimal temperature for photosynthesis. Automatic model constru
ction produced a number of regression trees that enabled a detailed but sim
ple description of the way irradiance, temperature and relative humidity af
fect photosynthesis. Photosynthesis increases with increasing irradiance, t
emperature affects photosynthesis when irradiance is close to saturation le
vels and relative humidity has an effect when both irradiance and temperatu
re are high. There is a threshold value of relative humidity (at about 35%)
, below which photosynthesis is independent of irradiance within the observ
ed range, decreasing with increasing temperature when temperature is high (
> 25 degrees C) and increasing with increasing relative humidity when tempe
rature is low (< 25 degrees C). The machine learning tools we used provide
a very powerful modelling alternative to ordinary curve fitting methods. Th
eir major advantages are the flexibility to select between accuracy and gen
erality and their robustness against outliers and mixtures of differential
responses. The models are transparent and easily interpreted. They seem to
be able to handle quite complex dependencies among attributes, not requirin
g prior expert knowledge. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserve
d.