It is often suggested that voter dissatisfaction is a more important d
eterminant of behavior than satisfaction. In the familiar terms of eco
nomic voting, this negativity bias implies that voters are more likely
to punish than reward incumbents for the status of the economy. Howev
er, economic conditions affect not only how people vote but whether th
ey vote, such that during periods of poor economic performance much of
the public resentment toward the in-party is absorbed by abstention (
Rosenstone 1982). Thus, the impact of recession is muted by the reduce
d propensity of those suffering its effects to actually vote- Given th
is fact, it appears that the president' s party is more consistently r
ewarded for its economic successes than it is punished for its failure
s.