Ranges of psychiatric morbidity in the old and the very old - results fromthe Berlin Aging Study (BASE)

Citation
Tf. Wernicke et al., Ranges of psychiatric morbidity in the old and the very old - results fromthe Berlin Aging Study (BASE), EUR ARCH PS, 250(3), 2000, pp. 111-119
Citations number
63
Categorie Soggetti
Clinical Psycology & Psychiatry","Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE
ISSN journal
09401334 → ACNP
Volume
250
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
111 - 119
Database
ISI
SICI code
0940-1334(200006)250:3<111:ROPMIT>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine prevalence rates of psychiatric morbidity in the elderly, distinguishing different levels of psychiatric ca seness as compared to the diagnoses of the DSM-III-R. In a cross-sectional population-based study in Berlin (West), Germany, 516 people aged 70 to 95 were randomly selected from the obligatory city registry (1990-1993) and s tratified by age and gender (N = 43 men and N = 43 women in each of six 5-y ear age groups). Psychiatric and physical examinations were carried out in an extensive standardized assessment. Distinct psychopathological syndromes occurred in 72.7% of the elderly (54.6% of the men, 79.1% of the women). A clinically defined psychiatric disorder was found in 49.4% Of the elderly (95% confidence interval 43.9% - 54.9%; 36.4% of the men, 54.0% of the wome n). Excluding insomnia, the overall psychiatric morbidity was 40.4% (30.9% m, 43.8% w). Excluding clinical diagnoses that were not otherwise specified in the DSM-III-R, the overall prevalence of specified DSM-III-R diagnoses was 23.5% (16.3% m, 26.0% w). Excluding dementia, which is known to be age- related, the prevalence was 11.3% (8.5% m, 12.2% w) and no significant effe ct between the age groups was seen. A considerable proportion of clinically relevant psychiatric morbidity in the elderly does not meet the criteria o f specified DSM-III-R diagnoses, although these cases are in need of care. The data show that the threshold and severity of caseness accounts for impo rtant differences when overall psychiatric morbidity is assessed.