Plasma catecholamine responses and neural adaptation during short-term resistance training

Citation
T. Pullinen et al., Plasma catecholamine responses and neural adaptation during short-term resistance training, EUR J A PHY, 82(1-2), 2000, pp. 68-75
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Physiology
Journal title
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
ISSN journal
14396319 → ACNP
Volume
82
Issue
1-2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
68 - 75
Database
ISI
SICI code
1439-6319(200005)82:1-2<68:PCRANA>2.0.ZU;2-O
Abstract
Low exercise-induced plasma adrenaline (A) responses have been reported in resistance-trained individuals. In the study reported here, we investigated the interaction between strength gain and neural adaptation of the muscles , and the plasma A response in eight healthy men during a short-term resist ance-training period. The subjects performed 5 resistance exercises (E1-E5) , consisting of 6 sets of 12 bilateral leg extensions performed at a 50% lo ad, and with 2 days rest in between. Average electromyographic (EMG) signal amplitude was recorded before and after the exercises, from the knee exten sor muscles in isometric maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) as well as dur ing the exercises (aEMG(max) and aEMG(exerc) respectively). Total oxygen co nsumed during the exercises ((V)over dot O-2tot) was also measured. All of the exercises were exhaustive and caused significant decreases in MVC (34-3 6%, P < 0.001). As expected, the concentric one-repetition maximum (I-RM), MVC and aEMG(max) were all higher before the last exercise (E5) than before the first exercise (E1: 7, 9 and 19%, respectively, P < 0.05). In addition , in E5 the aEMG(exerc):load and (V)over dot O-2tot:load ratios were lower than in El (-5 and -14%, P < 0.05), indicating enhanced efficiency of the m uscle contractions, However, the post-exercise plasma noradrenaline (NA) an d A were not different in these two exercises [mean (SD) 10.2 (3.8) nmol l( -1) vs 11.3 (6.0) nmol . l(-1), ns, and 1.2 (1.0) nmol . l(-1) vs 1.9 (1.1) nmol . l(-1), ns, respectively]. However, although NA increased similarly in every exercise (P ( 0.01), the increase in A reached the level of statis tical significance only in E1 (P < 0.05). The post-exercise A was also alre ady lower in E2 [0.7 (0.7) nmol . l(-1), P < 0.05) than in E1, despite the higher post-exercise blood lactate concentration than in the other exercise s [9.4 (1.1) mmol l(-1), P < 0.05]. Thus, the results suggest that the obse rved attenuation in the A response can not be explained by reduced exercise -induced strain due to the strength gain and neural adaptation of the muscl es. Correlation analysis actually revealed that those individuals who had t he highest strength gain during the training period even tended to have an increased post-exercise A concentration in the last exercise as compared to first one (r = 0.76, P < 0.05).