Objectives: To find whether germline and somatic gain-of-function mutations
of the thyrotropin receptor (TSHR) differ in location and/or mutational me
chanisms, as well as to explore the degree to which these mutations are spe
cific to TSHR compared with pituitary glycoprotein hormone receptors.
Methods: We examined the data on the TSHR website (www.unvi-leipzeig simila
r to innerre/TSH) supplemented with recent literature. Comparisons were als
o made with gain-of-function mutations of lutropin/choriogonadotropin (LH/C
GR) and follicle-stimulating hormone receptors (FSHR).
Results: Some mutations (at residues 183, 505, 509 and 597) are exclusively
germline, whereas mutations at 630 and 633 are characteristic of somatic m
utations. Several residues located mainly in a mutation cluster region (619
-639) are shared by both. Germline mutations are more likely to be transiti
ons than transversions compared with somatic mutations. The lack of mutatio
ns involving deamination of CpG dinucleotides, a common mechanism for C-->T
transitions, reflects the low CG prevalence in the mutable regions of TSHR
. Comparison of the mutation sites with the equivalent positions in LH/CGR
showed a significant difference (P < 0.0001), whereas those in the mutation
cluster region comprising the sixth transmembrane helix (TM6) and the adjo
ining third intracellular loop were concordant (P > 0.90). We suggest that
there is specific clustering of mutations in the juxtacytoplasmic end of TM
6 in LH/CGR, a hydrophobic patch that is tightly packed with a face on TM5
whose sequences diverge from those of TSHR.
Conclusions: TSHR exhibited frequent mutations outside the mutation cluster
region. A role for a mutagenic environment created by the thyroid for othe
r TSHR-specific codons cannot be discounted, nor can genetic factors, when
accounting for the variation in the prevalence of TSHR-activating mutations
worldwide.