Differential migration may provoke bias in an epidemiological assessment of
the public health risks from exposure to environmental agents, particularl
y in ecologic studies of health outcomes with a long latency or induction p
eriod. The potential impact of migration bias on epidemiological research i
s complex, and it depends not only on the direction of the factor-related m
igration, but also on its extent. This study shows that even a small amount
of differential migration can bias the assessment of the exposure-outcome
relationship. Migration bias may result from a number of circumstances that
are related to the way in which 'populations' are defined and ascertained.
It is important to understand and minimise this type of bias in epidemiolo
gical research.