Temporal and spatial combinations of tree-row weed suppression treatme
nts mere evaluated during 5 years in a New York apple (Malus domestica
Borkh, cv. Imperial Gala on Malling 26 rootstocks) orchard planted in
Apr, 1991, and provided with trickle irrigation. Twenty-eight factori
al treatment combinations [0, 2, 4, and 6 m(2) weed-free areas (WFAs);
and May, June, July, August, May + June, June + July, May + June + Ju
ly, and June + July + August weed-free times (WFTs)] were maintained f
rom 1991 to 1995 by postemergence paraquat herbicide applications in t
ree-row strips, Trunk cross-sectional area (TCA) growth and yield were
monitored annually, and few differences were observed as WFA increase
d from 2 to 4 to 6 m(2) per tree, However, WFT substantially influence
d TCA, fruit production, and yield efficiency. Early summer WFTs incre
ased TCA during the first two growing seasons, compared with late summ
er treatments, When trees came into production in 1993-94, yields incr
eased as the duration of WFT increased, but where similar periods of W
FT had been established later during the growing season, annual yield,
cumulative yield efficiency, and the ratio of crop value to weed-cont
rol costs were all reduced, Groundcover species distribution was evalu
ated each gear in September, and graminaceous weeds were more prevalen
t in the early and midsummer WFTs, while herbaceous broadleaf weeds do
minated in the August treatments, A quadratic model regressing cumulat
ive yield efficiency on WFTs grouped into 30-, 60-, and 90-day categor
ies showed that efficiency peaked between 60 and 90 days of WFT. It ap
peared that timing of weed suppression may be as important as the area
of suppression beneath trees in comparable apple orchards, that early
summer weed control was especially important for newly planted trees,
and that drip irrigation allowed reductions in the area and amount of
tree-row herbicide applications, without significant losses in apple
tree growth or crop value.