Objectives: this study was designed to determine whether an intermittent pn
eumatic compression device (IPC) with an increased maximal inflation pressu
re, a decreased time to maximal pressure and a longer duration of compressi
on would improve venous return compared to a standard IPC device.
Methods: thirty limbs in 15 volunteers without evidence of venous disease w
ere studied using duplex scanning at rest and during the application of two
different IPC devices with different compression parameters. The first dev
ice IPC-1 (SCD 5325, Kendall) has a six-chambered cuff applying 45 mmHg aft
er 12 s, sequentially from ankle to thigh followed by 60 s of non-compressi
on. The second device IPC-2 (Vena-Assist(R), ACl Medical) has a foot, ankle
and calf cuff, applies a pressure of 80 mmHg, has a pressure rise time of
0.3 s, maintains inflation for 5.5 s, and has a cycling time of 1 min. Peak
venous velocity and acceleration time were measured at rest and during the
IPC application. Measurements were obtained in supine position from the co
mmon femoral vein 1 cm above the saphenofemoral junction to include the ent
ire venous outflow from the limb.
Results: peak venous velocity at rest was significantly higher in the right
limb than in the left limb (26 +/- 7.2 vs. 22 +/- 5.7 cm/s, p<0.01). Peak
venous velocity was significantly increased by both IPC devices (p<0.0001).
IPC-2 achieved significantly higher peak venous velocity than IPC-1 (55.1
+/- 17.8 vs. 37.4 +/- 6.9 cm/s, p<0.0001). Acceleration time was also found
to be significantly shorter (370 +/- 93.4 vs. 560 +/- 83.5 ms, p<0.0001) i
n IPC-2 than in IPC-1, respectively.
Conclusions: we have demonstrated that progressive inflation at the foot, a
nkle and calf increasing maximal inflation pressure and decreasing time to
maximal pressure result in increased venous return. These changes may impro
ve the efficacy of IPC devices in the prevention of deep-venous thrombosis
(DVT) formation.