Life-table analysis of primary and assisted success following endoluminal repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: the role of supplementary endovascular intervention in improving outcome
J. May et al., Life-table analysis of primary and assisted success following endoluminal repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: the role of supplementary endovascular intervention in improving outcome, EUR J VAS E, 19(6), 2000, pp. 648-655
Citations number
6
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY
Aim: the aim of this study was to analyse the effect of supplementary endov
ascular intervention on the outcome of primary endoluminal repairs of abdom
inal aortic aneurysm (AAA).
Methods: between May 1992 and December 1998, 266 patients underwent endolum
inal repair of AAA. Minimum period of follow-up was 6 months. Those patient
s in whom the endoprosthesis could not be deployed were converted to open r
epair at the primary operation. Patients developing an early endoleak, with
in 31 days, were treated by a period of observation and secondary endovascu
lar intervention in persistent cases. Patients developing a late endoleak w
ere treated similarly, without a period of observation. Outcome was analyse
d by the life-table method. Primary success occurred when aneurysms with en
doleaks became excluded from the circulation as a result of supplementary e
ndovascular intervention.
Results: endoluminal repair failed in 17 patients requiring conversion to o
pen repair at the original operation Supplementary endovascular interventio
n was undertaken in 26 patients, with early endoleaks (n = 6) and late endo
leaks (n = 20). Interventions involved deployment of secondary endoluminal
grafts within the primary grafts (n = 22), and coil embolisation (n = 4). S
uccessful exclusion of the aneurysm sac was achieved in 22 of 26 (85%) pati
ents undergoing supplementary endovascular procedures, Conditional cumulati
ve incidence od primary graft failure and secondary graft failure in the pr
esence of all-cause mortality at 6 years was 47% and 25% respectively.
Conclusions: supplementary endovascular intervention is an important adjunc
t to endoluminal AAA repair with the potential to improve outcome and avoid
conversion to open repair. Successful supplementary endovascular intervent
ion was achieved in 85% of patients in whom it was attempted. Life-table an
alysis showed these supplementary procedures to be durable in the long term
.