Foliar nutrient and tree growth response of mixed-conifer stands to three fertilization treatments in northeast Oregon and north central Washington

Citation
Mt. Garrison et al., Foliar nutrient and tree growth response of mixed-conifer stands to three fertilization treatments in northeast Oregon and north central Washington, FOREST ECOL, 132(2-3), 2000, pp. 183-198
Citations number
49
Categorie Soggetti
Plant Sciences
Journal title
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
ISSN journal
03781127 → ACNP
Volume
132
Issue
2-3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
183 - 198
Database
ISI
SICI code
0378-1127(20000701)132:2-3<183:FNATGR>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
The results of two studies evaluating nutrient uptake in mixed-conifer stan ds following fertilization are reported. The four species examined were Dou glas-fir, grand fir, lodgepole pine and ponderosa pine. The fertilization t reatments were 224 kg ha(-1) nitrogen, 324 kg ha(-1) nitrogen plus 112 kg h a(-1) sulfur, and 224 kg ha(-1) nitrogen plus 190.4 kg ha(-1) potassium. Fo liar nutrient concentrations, contents and ratios were analyzed, as well as four-year volume response. Douglas-fir showed both N and S deficiencies in control foliage samples, and produced significant growth response to the N + S treatment, but not to the N-alone treatment. Grand fir also showed fol iar N and S deficiencies, but produced significant growth response to both N and N + S fertilization. This suggests that grand fir was better able to utilize N than Douglas-fir even under S-limiting conditions. Lodgepole pine showed deficient foliar N and S concentrations, and produced significant v olume responses to N and N + K fertilization. Lodgepole volume response to N + S fertilization was highly variable, and appeared to be site-specific, Ponderosa pine did not show nutrient deficiencies for N or K, and did not r espond significantly in either foliar K or S levels or in growth to N, N K or N + S fertilization. This suggests that nutrient deficiency may not ha ve been a factor limiting foliar nutrient response and growth for ponderosa pine. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.