This letter quantitatively evaluates two alternative approaches to the sche
duling of traffic streams in a high-speed ATM switch with multiple input qu
eues. Specifically, we compare a previously proposed algorithm, called it p
arallel iterative matching (PIM)-which is a cell-based scheduling algorithm
-with our newly proposed algorithm-which is a burst-based variation of the
PIM scheduling algorithm. Extensive simulation results will demonstrate tha
t burst-based PIM scheduling outperforms cell-based PIM scheduling under a
variety of realistic parameters.