Socioeconomic differences in fat intake in a middle-aged population: report from the Malmo Diet and Cancer Study

Citation
M. Lindstrom et al., Socioeconomic differences in fat intake in a middle-aged population: report from the Malmo Diet and Cancer Study, INT J EPID, 29(3), 2000, pp. 438-448
Citations number
48
Categorie Soggetti
Envirnomentale Medicine & Public Health","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
ISSN journal
03005771 → ACNP
Volume
29
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
438 - 448
Database
ISI
SICI code
0300-5771(200006)29:3<438:SDIFII>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
Background The objective was to investigate whether socioeconomic differenc es in fat intake may explain socioeconomic differences in cardiovascular di seases. Methods The Malmo Diet and Cancer Study is a prospective cohort study. The baseline examinations used in the present cross-sectional study were undert aken in 1992-1994. Dietary habits were assessed using a modified diet histo ry method consisting of a 7-day menu book and a 168-item questionnaire. A s ubpopulation of 11 837 individuals born 1926-1945 was investigated. This st udy examined high fat intake, defined as >35.9% among men and >34.8% among women (25% quartile limit) of the proportion of the non-alcohol energy inta ke contributed by fat. The subfractions saturated, mono-unsaturated and pol yunsaturated fatty acids and the P:S ratio (polyunsaturated/saturated fatty acids) were analysed in the same way. The uppermost quartile (75%) of tota l and subgroup fat intake was also studied. Socioeconomic differences befor e and after adjustment for low energy reporting (LER), defined as energy in take below 1.2 x Basal Metabolic Rate, were examined. Results No socioeconomic differences in fat intake were seen between the SE S groups, except for self-employed men, and male and female pensioners. App roximately 20% in most SES groups were LER. The LER and body mass index wer e strongly related. The SES pattern of fat intake remained unchanged after adjustment for age, country of origin and LER in a logistic regression mode l. The results for the subfractions of fat and the P:S ratio did not princi pally differ from the total fat results. Conclusions This study provides no evidence that fat intake contributes to the inverse socioeconomic differences in cardiovascular diseases.