The study reported in this paper examines the possibility that language con
fusion can be mistaken for misconception. A written test, consisting of 20
multiple choice items that had been used by other authors to diagnose misco
nceptions in physics was administered to a sample of matric level, English
first language, South African students. A sub-sample of these subjects was
then interviewed to explore the reasoning behind their choices in the writt
en lest. An analysis of the interviews showed that in several cases, distra
cters were chosen by subjects who did not hold the target misconceptions th
e items were intended to diagnose, and that language usage, for example mis
interpretation of the question text, was frequently the reason behind the c
hoices. The findings indicate that caution is needed in interpreting studen
ts' responses to multiple choice questions.