Dl. Roeber et al., Effects of a unique application of electrical stimulation on tenderness, color, and quality attributes of the beef longissimus muscle, J ANIM SCI, 78(6), 2000, pp. 1504-1509
This study evaluated effects of four uniquely applied beef carcass electric
al stimulation (ES) treatments on USDA grade factors, muscle color, subprim
al purge loss, cooked steak weight loss, and cooked steak tenderness. One s
ide of each (n = 284) beef carcass was subjected to ES using one of four tr
eatments (medium voltage for medium duration, MVMD; medium voltage for long
duration, MVLD; high voltage for medium duration, HVMD; or high voltage fo
r long duration, HVLD) and was compared to its corresponding non-ES control
side. Electrical stimulation of beef sides was applied focusing on middle
meats while preventing severe contraction of the round and chuck. From matc
hed (ES and control) sides of 120 carcasses (10 each of Select, low Choice,
and upper two-thirds of Choice in each of the four ES treatments), longiss
imus steaks (2.5 cru thick) were cooked and used for Warner-Bratzler shear
force (WBS) analysis. Mean marbling scores (n = 284) for stimulated sides d
id not differ (P = .923) from those for control sides within ES treatment c
lasses. Mean values for CIE L*, a*, and b* of lean color (n = 284) were hig
her (P < .05) for MVMD, MVLD, HVMD, and HVLD treated sides than for the res
pective control sides. When WBS values for steaks were adjusted to an equal
visual degree of doneness, WBS values (n = 120) were lower (P < .05) for E
S treated sides than for control sides for all four types of ES application
treatments. Treatment responses were not influenced by USDA Quality Grade
group. For those carcasses for which the control sides had WBS values great
er than 4.5 kg, matching sides treated with MVMD, MVLD, HVMD, or HVLD had W
BS values less than 4.5 kg 50, 88, 60, and 75% of the time, respectively. M
ean cooked steak weight loss (n = 120), adjusted Do an equal visual degree
of doneness, and mean purge loss (n = 24) did not differ with ES treatment.