Sc. Loerch et Fl. Fluharty, Use of trainer animals to improve performance and health of newly arrived feedlot calves, J ANIM SCI, 78(3), 2000, pp. 539-545
Four trials were conducted to determine the efficacy of using trainer anima
ls to improve the health and performance of newly arrived feedlot calves. F
or all trials, trainer animals were given 3 wk to adapt to the feedlot befo
re arrival of the feeder calves and initiation of the trials. Trainer anima
ls were present with newly received feedlot calves for 14 d after arrival a
nd then were removed from the pens for the remaining 14 d of the experiment
s. In Trial 1, trainer animals were six crossbred beef steers and six matur
e cull beef cows. Newly received calves were allotted to 18 pens with 10 ca
lves/pen. Six pens contained a trainer steer and six pens contained a train
er cow. Similar procedures were used for the subsequent three trials, excep
t 12 trainer cows and 24 pens were used, and in Trial 4 half of the calves
were allotted to pasture paddocks for 14 d before placement in their feedlo
t pens. During wk 1 of Trial 1, calves with trainer cows and steers gained
weight more rapidly (P < .10) than those without a trainer animal(1.12 vs .
67 kg/d, respectively). During wk 2, this trend was reversed and overall ga
ins did not differ (P > .20) among treatment groups. Morbidity was 16.7 for
control calves, 28.3% for calves with trainer steers, and 8.3% for calves
with trainer cows. Four of six trainer steers required antibiotic treatment
for respiratory disease. On d 1, a greater (P < .05) percentage of calves
in the trainer cow group (81.7%) were observed eating during the first 30 m
in after feeding compared with either the steer trainer group (60%) or the
control group containing no trainer animal (48.3%). This trend continued on
d 2 but was not evident on d 3 or 7. In Trial 2, overall gains were 10% gr
eater (P < .06) and final BW was higher (P < .01) for calves with trainer c
ows than for those without trainers. Trainer cows resulted in a substantial
reduction (P < .01) in calf morbidity compared with calves housed alone. I
n Trial 3, trainer cows did not improve performance or health of newly rece
ived calves. More (P < .07) calves with trainers than without were eating 5
min after feeding on d 1, 2, 4, and 8. In Trial 4, the presence of trainer
cows the first 2 wk did not affect (P > .27) gains. However, calves placed
on pasture after arrival had lower (P < .03) gains during wk 1 than those
housed in the feedlot. Calves placed in pasture paddocks upon arrival had m
ore than twice (P < .01) the incidence of morbidity of those placed directl
y in the feedlot. In these trials, trainer cows had a significant effect on
eating behavior of newly received calves, but health and performance benef
its were variable.