Use of trainer animals to improve performance and health of newly arrived feedlot calves

Citation
Sc. Loerch et Fl. Fluharty, Use of trainer animals to improve performance and health of newly arrived feedlot calves, J ANIM SCI, 78(3), 2000, pp. 539-545
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Animal Sciences
Journal title
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE
ISSN journal
00218812 → ACNP
Volume
78
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
539 - 545
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-8812(200003)78:3<539:UOTATI>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
Four trials were conducted to determine the efficacy of using trainer anima ls to improve the health and performance of newly arrived feedlot calves. F or all trials, trainer animals were given 3 wk to adapt to the feedlot befo re arrival of the feeder calves and initiation of the trials. Trainer anima ls were present with newly received feedlot calves for 14 d after arrival a nd then were removed from the pens for the remaining 14 d of the experiment s. In Trial 1, trainer animals were six crossbred beef steers and six matur e cull beef cows. Newly received calves were allotted to 18 pens with 10 ca lves/pen. Six pens contained a trainer steer and six pens contained a train er cow. Similar procedures were used for the subsequent three trials, excep t 12 trainer cows and 24 pens were used, and in Trial 4 half of the calves were allotted to pasture paddocks for 14 d before placement in their feedlo t pens. During wk 1 of Trial 1, calves with trainer cows and steers gained weight more rapidly (P < .10) than those without a trainer animal(1.12 vs . 67 kg/d, respectively). During wk 2, this trend was reversed and overall ga ins did not differ (P > .20) among treatment groups. Morbidity was 16.7 for control calves, 28.3% for calves with trainer steers, and 8.3% for calves with trainer cows. Four of six trainer steers required antibiotic treatment for respiratory disease. On d 1, a greater (P < .05) percentage of calves in the trainer cow group (81.7%) were observed eating during the first 30 m in after feeding compared with either the steer trainer group (60%) or the control group containing no trainer animal (48.3%). This trend continued on d 2 but was not evident on d 3 or 7. In Trial 2, overall gains were 10% gr eater (P < .06) and final BW was higher (P < .01) for calves with trainer c ows than for those without trainers. Trainer cows resulted in a substantial reduction (P < .01) in calf morbidity compared with calves housed alone. I n Trial 3, trainer cows did not improve performance or health of newly rece ived calves. More (P < .07) calves with trainers than without were eating 5 min after feeding on d 1, 2, 4, and 8. In Trial 4, the presence of trainer cows the first 2 wk did not affect (P > .27) gains. However, calves placed on pasture after arrival had lower (P < .03) gains during wk 1 than those housed in the feedlot. Calves placed in pasture paddocks upon arrival had m ore than twice (P < .01) the incidence of morbidity of those placed directl y in the feedlot. In these trials, trainer cows had a significant effect on eating behavior of newly received calves, but health and performance benef its were variable.