Chemical vapor deposition of undoped and in-situ boron- and arsenic-doped epitaxial and polycrystalline silicon films grown using silane at reduced pressure

Citation
J. Pejnefors et al., Chemical vapor deposition of undoped and in-situ boron- and arsenic-doped epitaxial and polycrystalline silicon films grown using silane at reduced pressure, J APPL PHYS, 88(3), 2000, pp. 1655-1663
Citations number
44
Categorie Soggetti
Apllied Physucs/Condensed Matter/Materiales Science
Journal title
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
ISSN journal
00218979 → ACNP
Volume
88
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1655 - 1663
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-8979(20000801)88:3<1655:CVDOUA>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
A nonselective epitaxial growth process for heterojunction bipolar transist ors has been studied. The difference in growth rates for epitaxial and poly crystalline films could be used to monitor the thickness of the intrinsic a nd extrinsic base layers. The films were grown using chemical vapor deposit ion on Si < 100 > (epitaxy) and on silicon dioxide (polycrystalline) at red uced pressure (20-80 Torr) for undoped and in situ B or As doping. The depo sitions were carried out using silane diluted in hydrogen. Diborane and ars ine were used as the source gas for dopants. For the undoped Si films, the deposition of polycrystalline films had a substantially higher rate than th at of epitaxial ones. The growth rate of both epitaxial and polycrystalline depositions decreased with increasing total pressure. It was, however, lin early proportional to the silane partial pressure, p(SiH4). The dependence of the growth rate on the hydrogen partial pressure was proportional to p(H 2)(-0.82) for epitaxial and to p(H2)(-0.60) for polycrystalline depositions . The apparent activation energy was 2.1 and 1.6 eV for the epitaxial and p olycrystalline depositions, respectively. A growth mechanism assuming the d issociative adsorption of silane on the Si surface, in combination with fir st-order hydrogen desorption kinetics, was employed to describe the experim ental observations, including the differences in deposition rates, dependen cy on the hydrogen partial pressure as well as apparent activation energy. In situ B doping influenced neither the epitaxial nor polycrystalline depos itions. In situ As doping, on the other hand, largely reduced the growth ra te compared to the undoped films to such an extent that there was no apprec iable difference in growth rate between the epitaxial and polycrystalline S i. The doping concentration in the epitaxial B and As films were of the ord er of 10(18) cm(-3), identical deposition conditions yielded a 5 and 20 tim es larger dopant incorporation in the B and As doped polycrystalline films, respectively. (C) 2000 American Institute of Physics. [S0021-8979(00)03315 -6].