The purpose of this study was to assess the utility of using maternal asses
sments of infant birth size as proxy measures for birth weight in Ecuador,
a country in which a sizeable proportion of births take place at home, wher
e birth weight is typically not recorded. Four thousand and seventy-eight w
omen who experienced a live singleton birth between January 1992 and August
1994 were interviewed in the Ecuador Demographic and Maternal-Child Health
Survey. All women were asked if their child was weighed at birth, his/her
weight, and what they considered to be his/her birth size relative to other
newborns. The consistency between birth size and birth weight measures was
assessed, and the differences between infants with and without reported bi
rth weights were explored. The authors conclude that maternal assessments o
f birth size are poor proxy indicators of birth weight. Estimates of low bi
rth weight based on maternal assessments of birth size as very small should
be recognized as underestimates of the actual prevalence of low birth weig
ht. Moreover, infants for whom birth weights are missing should not be cons
idered similar to those for whom weight was reported. Those without reporte
d birth weights are more likely to be low birth weight. Thus, relying solel
y on reports of numeric birth weight will underestimate the prevalence of l
ow birth weight.