The cognitive calculus theory of foreign policy decision making is an attem
pt to bridge the gap between two research orientations in the international
relations literature: outcome validity and process validity. The cognitive
calculus theory models the mental calculations of foreign policy decision
making with the premise that an individual conducts the decision-making pro
cess and the model should therefore represent his or her capabilities. An e
xperiment tested a few of the model's derivations concerning the effects of
the quality of information on process and choice parameters. The results s
upport major aspects of the cognitive calculus theory. Relevant items are a
ttended to more carefully than irrelevant items and speed up the decision p
rocess. Furthermore, the valence of the relevant items disposes the choice
of a corresponding option. The consequences of plugging the information set
used in the experiment into the mathematical model of cognitive calculus s
how that human behavior parallels the model's predictions.