Am. Davies et P. Hall, A three-dimensional model of diurnal and semidiurnal tides and tidal mixing in the North Channel of the Irish Sea, J GEO RES-O, 105(C7), 2000, pp. 17079-17104
The spatial variability of the M-2, S-2, N-1, K-1 and O-1 tides are examine
d using a high-resolution model of the North Channel of the Irish Sea. The
sensitivity of computed currents and elevations to two formulations of the
vertical eddy viscosity, one involving a turbulence energy submodel, and an
other in which it is computed from the flow field, are examined. Tidal elev
ation amplitudes and phases are compared at 20 gauges and shown to be in go
od agreement with observations. Root mean square (rms) errors of 7.85 cm, 3
2 degrees (turbulence energy model) and 7.93 cm, 41 degrees(flow dependent
viscosity model) were found for the M-2 tide. Comparable errors were found
for the other semidiurnal tides. Differences in the amplitude errors betwee
n the two models are below the uncertainty associated with open boundary fo
rcing and measurement errors and are therefore not statistically significan
t. Computed cotidal charts showed good agreement with published cotidal cha
rts derived from observations. Comparison with observed M-2 tidal current p
rofiles suggests that at some locations a more accurate profile is determin
ed with the turbulence model, while at others the flow-dependent solution i
s more accurate. A comparison of M-2 tidal current shear in the vertical sh
owed that the turbulence energy model had a slight bias to underestimate th
is shear. This bias was not found in the flow-dependent viscosity model. Fo
r the other tidal constituents the uncertainty in the accuracy of the curre
nts prevented such a comparison. Also, it is not possible to decide with an
y confidence which closure method is more accurate, due to possible errors
in the data and the small number of locations where significant shear is fo
und in the vertical. The spatial variability of tidal elevations and curren
ts shows an amphidromic point for the semidiurnal tides but none for the di
urnal tides, in the northern part of the North Channel. Significant differe
nces in tidal current are found between the North Channel and the Clyde Sea
, where tidal currents are strong and weak, respectively, This difference i
s related to the tidal energy flux in the region which is confined to the N
orth Channel. The spring-neap temporal and spatial variability of tidal tur
bulence shows a close correlation with tidal current magnitude and water de
pth. This in part explains why the simple flow-related viscosity model give
s comparable results to those from the turbulence model.