The midsagittal profile of the mandibular symphysis has served as both a ta
xonomic marker and a phylogenetically salient character in debates over hom
inoid evolution. Nevertheless, the utility of symphyseal shape as an inform
ative attribute for paleobiological reconstructions is suspect. Quantificat
ion of shape variation has proven to be particularly problematic; it has lo
ng been recognized that conventional linear measurements (and the indices d
erived from them), while replicable, summarize aspects of shape very poorly
because of the vast amount of contour information that is lost in the proc
ess.
In this study, a type of Fourier analysis is applied to cross-sectional con
tours of ape mandibles in order to provide a mathematical accounting of sha
pe variation in a "global" sense; that is, by applying the "totality" of co
ntour information in a comparative analysis. Shape variation in the mandibu
lar symphysis is explored through the decomposition of coordinate data into
elliptical Fourier coefficients. These coefficients are used to compute av
erage taxonomic distances (ATD) among individuals of chimpanzees, gorillas,
and orang-utans. The resulting shape-based distances are summarized via cl
ustering (UPGMA) and ordination (principal coordinates analysis-PCO). Princ
ipal coordinate scores are subjected to analysis of variance in univariate
and multivariate designs; these data are also applied to discriminant funct
ion analyses.
Species and sex effects on morphology are statistically significant; howeve
r, no significant interaction of these factors is indicated. This would see
m to imply that patterns of sexual dimorphism are not distinct among great
apes; to the contrary, within-species sex comparisons reveal that significa
nt size and shape dimorphism is present only in Gorilla. Despite significan
t size dimorphism in Pan and Pongo, significant shape differences between m
ales and females are not apparent in these taxa.
These results suggest that it is theoretically possible to sort taxa by a s
ymphyseal shape criterion, but the discriminant function results suggest th
at there still exists a large potential for error in assigning particular s
hapes to a given species or sex. Thus, despite real shape differences among
these species, the use of symphyseal shape as a character in species ident
ification or in systematic arguments remains limited and problematic. (C) 2
000 Academic Press.